Essential guidance on appointed representative oversight, due diligence requirements, and monitoring frameworks for principal firms.
The appointed representative (AR) regime has come under intense regulatory scrutiny in recent years, with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) making it abundantly clear that principal firms must take their oversight responsibilities seriously. For firms operating AR networks, the message is unambiguous: robust governance is no longer optional—it is essential.
In this article, we explore the fundamentals of appointed representative compliance, examine the FCA's enhanced expectations following the 2022 regulatory changes, and provide practical guidance for building an oversight framework that protects both your firm and your customers.
Understanding the AR Relationship
What is an Appointed Representative?
An appointed representative is a firm or individual that carries out regulated activities under the authorisation of a principal firm. The AR model allows businesses to conduct certain financial services activities without obtaining direct FCA authorisation, instead operating under the regulatory umbrella of their principal.
This arrangement can be mutually beneficial. For the AR, it provides access to the market without the cost and complexity of direct authorisation. For the principal, it offers opportunities for business expansion and revenue generation through oversight fees. However, this commercial opportunity comes with significant regulatory responsibility.
Under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), the principal firm accepts full responsibility for the AR's regulated activities. Put simply, if your appointed representative causes harm to customers or breaches regulatory requirements, the FCA will hold you accountable.
Principal Firm Responsibilities
The responsibilities of a principal firm extend far beyond simply registering an AR with the FCA. Under SUP 12 of the FCA Handbook, principals must:
- Ensure the AR is fit and proper to carry out the activities for which they are appointed
- Establish and maintain adequate systems and controls to oversee the AR's activities
- Take reasonable care to ensure the AR complies with all applicable regulatory requirements
- Accept responsibility for any claims against the AR arising from regulated activities
- Maintain appropriate professional indemnity insurance covering the AR's activities
These obligations are not passive. The FCA expects principal firms to take an active role in supervising their ARs, with clear escalation procedures when issues arise.
Types of AR Arrangements
The AR regime accommodates various business models, each presenting distinct oversight challenges:
Introducer Appointed Representatives (IARs) have a limited permission set, typically restricted to making introductions and distributing non-real-time financial promotions. Whilst the compliance burden is lighter, principals must still ensure IARs operate within their permitted scope.
Full Appointed Representatives can conduct a broader range of regulated activities, including advising on and arranging investments. The extended permission set demands correspondingly robust oversight arrangements.
Networks involve principals overseeing multiple ARs, often operating across different geographical locations or business lines. Network principals face the challenge of maintaining consistent standards whilst adapting to the varied risk profiles of individual ARs.
Understanding which model applies to your arrangements is fundamental to designing proportionate oversight mechanisms.
FCA's Enhanced Expectations: The 2022 Changes
In December 2022, the FCA implemented significant changes to the AR regime following a comprehensive review that identified widespread concerns about principal firm oversight. The regulator found that some principals were treating AR appointments as little more than revenue-generating exercises, with insufficient attention paid to the risks being created.
The updated rules, set out in PS22/11, establish clearer and more demanding expectations across three key areas.
Pre-Appointment Due Diligence
Before appointing an AR, principal firms must now conduct thorough due diligence covering:
Business Model Assessment: Understand precisely what the AR intends to do, how they will generate revenue, and whether their business model is viable and sustainable. Red flags include AR business models that appear too good to be true or rely heavily on high-pressure sales tactics.
Competence and Capability: Verify that the AR's key personnel possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and experience to conduct regulated activities competently. This includes checking qualifications, employment history, and references.
Financial Soundness: Assess whether the AR has sufficient financial resources to meet its ongoing obligations and withstand potential operational challenges. A financially unstable AR presents heightened risks of consumer harm.
Regulatory History: Conduct thorough checks on the AR and its principals, including Companies House searches, credit checks, and reviews of any previous regulatory interactions or enforcement actions.
Fitness and Propriety: Evaluate whether the AR's owners, directors, and key personnel are fit and proper persons. This assessment should consider honesty, integrity, reputation, competence, and financial soundness.
The FCA expects this due diligence to be documented comprehensively, creating an audit trail that demonstrates the principal's decision-making process.
Ongoing Monitoring Requirements
The 2022 changes reinforced that oversight does not end at appointment. Principal firms must implement continuous monitoring arrangements that include:
Regular Review of AR Activities: Monitor the AR's regulated activities on an ongoing basis, reviewing sales data, customer outcomes, and compliance with agreed procedures.
Financial Monitoring: Keep track of the AR's financial position, with particular attention to any signs of distress that could affect their ability to meet customer obligations.
Complaint Analysis: Review complaints received by or about the AR, identifying trends that may indicate systemic issues requiring intervention.
Quality Assurance: Conduct regular file reviews, call monitoring, and other quality assurance activities proportionate to the AR's activities and risk profile.
Site Visits: Where appropriate, conduct periodic visits to the AR's premises to verify that operations match documented procedures.
The frequency and intensity of monitoring should reflect the AR's risk profile, with higher-risk ARs subject to more frequent and detailed scrutiny.
Annual Review Obligations
Principal firms must now conduct formal annual reviews of each AR relationship. These reviews should assess:
- Whether the AR remains fit and proper
- The AR's ongoing compliance with regulatory requirements
- Customer outcomes and any patterns of harm
- The adequacy of the principal's own oversight arrangements
- Whether the AR's activities remain within the scope of the original appointment
The annual review should result in documented conclusions and, where necessary, action plans to address identified deficiencies.
Building an Effective AR Oversight Framework
Theory is valuable, but practical implementation is what the FCA ultimately assesses. Here we outline the key components of an effective oversight framework.
Due Diligence Checklist
A robust pre-appointment due diligence process should include:
Corporate Verification:
- Companies House searches confirming legal status and ownership
- Verification of registered address and trading addresses
- Review of filed accounts and confirmation statements
- Director and person of significant control checks
Individual Assessments:
- CV verification for key personnel
- Qualification checks (relevant professional qualifications)
- Employment reference checks
- Credit checks and bankruptcy searches
- Criminal record declarations
- FCA Register checks for previously registered individuals
Business Model Review:
- Detailed business plan assessment
- Revenue model analysis
- Target customer base identification
- Marketing strategy review
- Conflict of interest assessment
Operational Readiness:
- IT systems and data security arrangements
- Complaint handling procedures
- Record-keeping capabilities
- Training and competence frameworks
Monitoring MI and KPIs
Effective oversight requires timely access to meaningful management information. Consider tracking:
Activity Metrics:
- Volume of regulated activities conducted
- New customer acquisition rates
- Product mix and average transaction values
- Conversion rates from enquiry to sale
Quality Indicators:
- File review pass rates
- Call monitoring scores
- Training completion rates
- Competence assessment results
Customer Outcome Measures:
- Complaint volumes and root causes
- Cancellation rates
- Customer satisfaction scores
- Vulnerable customer identification rates
Financial Health:
- Revenue trends
- Outstanding debtor balances
- Cash flow indicators
- Professional indemnity insurance status
Establish clear thresholds that trigger escalation and intervention when breached.
Complaint Handling Procedures
The principal firm retains ultimate responsibility for complaint handling, even where the AR handles initial responses. Your framework should address:
- Clear allocation of responsibilities between principal and AR
- Timescales for complaint acknowledgement and resolution
- Escalation procedures for complex or serious complaints
- Root cause analysis and trend identification
- Reporting to the principal's compliance function
- FCA reporting obligations (including to the Financial Ombudsman Service)
Training Requirements
Ensure ARs and their staff receive appropriate training covering:
- Regulatory framework and FCA expectations
- Products and services they are authorised to sell
- Treating Customers Fairly principles
- Vulnerable customer identification and support
- Financial crime awareness
- Data protection and information security
- Complaint handling procedures
Training should be documented, with records maintained demonstrating completion and competence assessment.
Common Compliance Failures
Learning from others' mistakes can help you avoid regulatory censure. The FCA has identified several recurring themes in AR oversight failures.
Inadequate Due Diligence
Some principals have appointed ARs based on commercial considerations alone, without conducting meaningful background checks. In one enforcement case, a principal appointed an AR whose directors had previously been involved in regulatory breaches—information that basic due diligence would have revealed.
Practical tip: Treat due diligence as a genuine investigative exercise, not a box-ticking formality. If something does not add up, dig deeper or walk away.
Weak Ongoing Monitoring
The FCA has criticised principals who conduct initial due diligence but then adopt a hands-off approach, only engaging when problems become too significant to ignore. By that point, customer harm has often already occurred.
Practical tip: Establish a monitoring rhythm appropriate to each AR's risk profile and stick to it. Document your monitoring activities and findings, even when no issues are identified.
Poor Documentation
Even where principals have conducted appropriate oversight, inadequate documentation has left them unable to demonstrate this to the FCA. The regulator operates on the principle that if it is not documented, it did not happen.
Practical tip: Create contemporaneous records of all oversight activities, decisions, and rationales. Store documentation securely and ensure it can be retrieved promptly if requested.
Termination Procedures
Not all AR relationships work out, and sometimes termination is the appropriate response to persistent compliance failures or changed business circumstances. Your framework should include:
Grounds for Termination: Define clearly what circumstances will trigger termination, including material compliance breaches, financial distress, or loss of trust and confidence.
Notice Procedures: Ensure your AR agreement specifies notice periods and procedures, whilst retaining the ability to terminate immediately in cases of serious misconduct.
Customer Communication: Plan how customers will be informed and what arrangements will be made for ongoing servicing of existing business.
FCA Notification: Remember your obligation to notify the FCA of AR terminations within the required timeframes.
Record Retention: Ensure you retain appropriate records following termination, both for regulatory purposes and potential future disputes.
How MEMA Can Help
Managing an AR network effectively requires expertise, resources, and constant vigilance. At MEMA Consultants, we understand the challenges principal firms face in meeting the FCA's elevated expectations.
Our appointed representative compliance services include:
-
Framework Design: We help you build oversight frameworks tailored to your specific AR arrangements, ensuring proportionality whilst meeting regulatory requirements.
-
Due Diligence Support: Our team can conduct or review pre-appointment due diligence, providing independent assurance that your processes are robust.
-
Monitoring Programme Development: We design monitoring programmes that generate meaningful MI and enable proactive risk management.
-
Training Delivery: We provide regulatory training for both principal firm staff and AR personnel, ensuring everyone understands their responsibilities.
-
Health Checks and Gap Analysis: We review existing AR oversight arrangements, identifying weaknesses and recommending improvements before the regulator identifies them for you.
-
Regulatory Response Support: If you face FCA scrutiny of your AR arrangements, we provide expert support through the regulatory engagement process.
The AR regime offers genuine commercial opportunities, but only for firms that take their oversight obligations seriously. With the right framework in place, you can grow your network with confidence whilst protecting your customers and your reputation.
Ready to strengthen your AR oversight arrangements? Contact our team today to discuss how we can help you manage your network without the headaches.
MEMA Regulatory Team
The MEMA Regulatory Team includes ex-FCA supervisors and Big 4 consultants with deep expertise across all aspects of UK financial services regulation and compliance.
Need regulatory support?
Our team can help with FCA authorisation, compliance outsourcing, and regulatory change implementation.
Book a consultation


